I’m sure by now we’re all familiar with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (maybe too familiar). It feels like he dominates the news. Whether it be accusations that he is sponsoring terrorism and fighting a proxy war in Iraq, his denials of the Holocaust as fact and refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist, or most recently, his speaking engagement at Columbia University and request to be allowed to visit the sight of the World Trade Center (to place a wreath and pay his respects), the man is a lightning rod for controversy.
So the question I ask is this: is Ahmadinejad the psychotic, illogical and “tyrannical dictator” that he often comes across as, or is he the clever, crafty PR man I suspect him to be?
Surely his ill-advised pursuit of a nuclear program, which thus far has only served to isolate him and his country, places him in the same sphere of delusion as Kim Jong Il. His stance that the Holocaust is a “theory that requires more research” is so absurd that it’s hard to even argue with. He denies that homosexuals live in Iran. His human rights abuses against women and dissidents (there have been over 300 political executions since January) are despicable. Plus, he’s a terrible government official. Economically, Iran is in shambles despite it’s location in the oil-rich Middle East. He’s fallen out of favor with the poor class that elected him. His bombastic rhetoric has become somewhat of a running (though hushed) joke in academic circles.
But the very fact that we pay him so much attention shows that A) we have very little understanding of how the politics of Iran work, and B) Ahmadinejad is a mastermind of self promotion.
Allow me to address these points in order. The truth of it is, Ahmadinejad has limited influence, almost no power, and the fact that we place so much emphasis on him only serves to increase his stature. The presidency in Iran is very different than it is in the US. The effective head of Iran’s political establishment is the Supreme Leader (currently Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), who serves a dual political and religious role. He is backed by a group of mullahs (the Islamic clergy).
The president can influence governmental proceedings by choosing members of parliament and appointing mayors, but ultimately has little say beyond this. The Supreme Leader controls the armed forces, makes final decisions on policy and law, and it is only with his approval that the president can operate at all. Even the much ballyhooed nuclear program falls inside the Supreme Leader’s scope (despite what Ahmadinejad would have the rest of the world believe).
So how has Ahmadinejad managed to manifest a persona as the all powerful, dangerous leader of a terroristic country? By spreading suspicion, confusion, fear and anger, and letting the media do the leg work for him. By making outrageous assertions with bold rhetoric (ie the Holocaust as myth, vows to destroy the west), he plays on our sympathies and our nightmares. By acting as the public face of Iran’s nuclear program, he projects the image that it’s his nuclear program.
Every time he’s allowed to address the UN, every time we play a clip of him on CNN, every time someone like Lee Bollinger (the president of Columbia University) accuses him of being a “petty dictator” (a leader with no power can hardly be called a dictator), we inflate this power in the eyes of the world and in the eyes of his people.
Meanwhile, the true rulers of Iran can act with immunity in obscurity. They can continue to oppress women and dissidents. They can continue to use their Revolutionary Guards to spread mayhem in Iraq. They can continue enriching uranium. As long as Ahmadenijad is the voice and face of evil, as long the west believes that he is the man calling the shots in Iran, Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his mullahs will escape unscathed (truth be told, I don’t even know what the Grand Ayatollah looks like).
It would be easy enough to get rid of Ahmadinejad. He has already succeeded in marginalizing himself by falling out of favor with the people who elected him. These people are the true victims of Ahmadinejad’s tense relations with the west. UN sanctions against Iran have ravaged an already poverty stricken people, and economically the country has gone to hell. Iranians are, generally speaking, highly educated people and it’s safe to assume they won’t put up with oppression silently.
If the US would get smart and start ignoring Ahmadinejad like the harmless nuisance that he is, in turn applying some pressure to the Grand Ayatollah, the man would disappear. He would no longer be of any use. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a puppet with a Ph.D. in traffic management, and could easily be replaced.
But first we would have to get smart…on foreign policy. When will that happen? Your guess is as good as mine.
Thanks for reading.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Well like you said Gruber I was trying to ignore this man and everything that he has brought to the table, but you had to go and do an entire article about him. Now I can't stop thinking about him, thanks a lot.
Actually, I haven't paid attention to this man very much. I know who he is and some of the things that he has said. And of course with all the media covering every single thing he does it is hard to not to hear about him. I agree though, we ultimately have the control to make him as big a deal as we want. It's hard not too when everything around us is making him look like an extremely important man.
I am going to go on the rest of the day and try not to even picture the man or think of him. After all that was how my morning started until I read the Zot.
P.S. HALO 3 came out, better then HALO 2? I bet so.
Better then the original...
NEVER!!
I am not smart enough to comment on today's post. But I am compelled to respond to werd's outrageous comment (and unfortunately, the popular feeling among zizzle zotians) that the original Halo is the best of the series.
The pistol is ridiculous, and I am happy that it has been brought back down to earth by Halo 3. Nobody can shoot a pistol 300 yards and kill someone in 3 shots. You guys are nothing without the pistol.
Hopefully with Halo 3 out, we can put this relic of a game behind us.
I don't have anything else to add to the post so I'll go along with the trend and talk about Halo.
First of all Kevan, you are ridiculous. Shooting all the way across the board with a pistol takes an enormous amount of skill. You are just angry because you wasted your time learning Halo 2 and not sharpening your skills with a pistol. So now you are angry at us because we are so unstoppable with the pistol that you get frustrated and take it out by saying that Halo 1 sucks.
I hope that Halo 3 is a better game than Halo 2. I am very skeptical that it could be better than the first. Very few things are ever better than the original. I am excited to try my hand at it. Unfortunately I do not have a 360 so I will probably not be able to play very much which will in turn make me probably not like it as much. But you never know.
Halo 1 and Epic Duels 4 life!
Thanks Werd Yelof for your insight. Hold your horses the rest of you on your Halo craze. You all know that when I am back for Christmas I will assume the position of Froto and bring the key from one base to the next without hesitation or hold up.
Question for Zot...
Where did you get this proposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you? STEVE! I am curious of your sources. I am not saying you are wrong in your research, but how can a man with such little power bring so much controversy that the US is contemplating waging war against Iran? Are we (the US) so gullible that we will believe that he has power enough to do what he will do? Or is it simply a case of the media portraying MA as a dictator and our gov't deals with the actual power in Iran?
I wasn't aware of how weak he was in his own country. I assumed a more powerful Iran meant a more powerful Ahmadinejad.
Also, I always wonder how people from the Middle East interpret the fact that one of our worst enemies is given the chance to visit America. Does it highlight our freedom, or is it seen as a weakness?
Halo 3's got nothing on Pokemon Snap
I like how a post about something important turns into talking about Halo...
I love Halo! Today, my little brother bought an XBOX 360 and Halo 3... So, with due time I will tell you all how sweet it is and kick all your sorry asses.
Mr. A.,
Pokemon Snap is also a fun game... Nothing revs a grown man up more than taking a kick ass picture of Charizard!
ohh... also...
I wasn't able to check out yesterday's post "reaction" on the proper day, sorry.
But one thing really bothered me...
All of you people really like Nicholas Cage? That guy is an idiot who did a good job acting once in his life, Adaptation (like Grubes said). Otherwise I don't know how people are still handing him scripts to read.
I will admit. He has been in good movies. Yes, he has, but he has not acted well in any of them, except Adaptation. I really don't like him!
...sorry I got so upset...
Hey Cassel, good questions. Information on the political structure of Iran isn't hard to find. Just type "Political structure+Iran" into Google and you'll get many articles, including this one:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/03/iran_power/html/default.stm
which should further help to clarify any questions (you can click on the position in the chart to get specifics on that individual or group's role).
As for why the US places such importance on Ahmadinejad, that's a little more complex. The Grand Ayatollah is virtually untouchable, and as a result it is difficult for our leaders to deal with him directly.
I think our leaders work with MA because they want to look like they're doing something, even if he can't actually change anything.
Truth is, he doesn't have the power to do the things he says he will, but the best the US government can do is assume he is speaking for the Grand Ayatollah. This arrangement works out great for the Grand Ayatollah. Let Ahmadinejad make a scene and draw the attention while he (the GA) doesn't have to answer to anyone.
It doesn't help that when it comes to foreign policy we are a bunch of buffoons.
Kevan, you're right, nobody can shoot a pistol 300 yards and kill someone in 3 shots. Usually when I'm battling alien forces in real life I go in for close combat with my plasma rifle, or just slap them on the back of the head. Dumbass.
Swajac, I've already expressed my agreement with you. Cage sucks.
I agreed that Cage sucked too if you couldn't feel the sarcasm in my comment Jake!
Post a Comment