I’m not really much of a conspiracy theorist. I’d say odds are good we did in fact land on the moon in 1969, John F. Kennedy was shot by one man (Lee Harvey Oswald), and Elvis is, as he has been for some time, dead.
That being said, I’ve come to believe I must be going crazy. Or else everyone around me is. Or maybe just the government. I don’t know who it is yet, but somebody’s flown completely off their rocker.
In the last few days a bill, known as the Protect America Act, passed through the Senate and the House which makes it legal for the director of national intelligence and the attorney general to intercept, without a warrant, any telephone call or email message that moves in, out of or through the United States as long as there is “reasonable belief” that one party is not in the United States.
Given my little understanding of the technology involved, and an even smaller understanding of the legalese, let me attempt to offer you a little history lesson (apologies if it’s more like history for dummies).
Following the Watergate scandal the government passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to govern domestic spying. When it was originally written, the act required anyone wanting to eavesdrop within the US to obtain a warrant. It didn’t apply to purely foreign communications, which the NSA could listen to and gather as they pleased.
But with new technology problems have arisen. With the arrival of telecommunications and the internet, a communication between, for example, London and Baghdad might be routed through the United States, making it off limits for government agents.
Naturally, this gap had to be closed, and it could have been a fairly simple fix. Just add an amendment to the FISA that made it legal to intercept foreign communications as they transited through the US. In fact, a bill was proposed that would do just this, complete with oversight mechanisms including FISA court review, periodic audits, and explicit provisions against purely domestic surveillance.
This wasn’t good enough, however, for the Bush administration. They wanted all of the power with none of the oversight, and by threatening to hold Congress hostage during their summer vacation (they usually take August off – wouldn’t that be nice?) until they got “a bill he (Bush) could sign,” Bush and friends bullied Congress into agreeing to a new act which, for all practical purposes, gives him the power of a Fidel Castro, a Kim Jung Il, or a Joseph Stalin.
Now, thanks to Protect America, all the NSA needs to listen in on every conversation you or I have is a “reasonable belief” by presidential croneys (the president appoints both the director of national intelligence and the attorney general) that you could possibly be talking to someone outside of this country. Government agencies simply don’t have the manpower or technical resources to sort through the billions upon billions of bits of data passing through America’s telecommunications systems (as reported by the New York Times; don’t take my word for it), let alone the capabilities to establish who is or is not communicating with foreigners. Plus, we’ve already seen that the government plays loose and fast with the concept of “reasonable belief” (WMDs, Guantanamo Bay), and with no one to answer to the government has awarded itself unchecked power. We have been ushered into a terrifying era of unprecedented governmental control, and I can assure you that the founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.
Think what you will about George W. Bush. I’m not trying to pass judgment. I don’t think he’s an evil man. He’s been placed in some difficult situations and it wouldn’t be fair to blame him for the majority of them.
But think about the repercussions of the Protect America Act. I’ve read 1984, Fahrenheit 451, and Brave New World. Let me tell you that this is how it all starts. Next thing you know we’ll all be taking Soma and speaking in Groupthink.
Maybe I’ve already said too much. Good luck and Godspeed.
Thanks for reading.
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Interesting post. I don't want to say too much, because they might be reading this message as I write it. So I will keep things short.
Go Celtics!
My quick thoughts are this. First, who really cares if some 50 year old white man in a suit in Washington is listening to any of our conversations. I have nothing to hide... Do you?
I wouldn't care if anyone in the government listened to all my conversations as long is they are doing it with my interest and America's interest in mind trying to protect us all.
The purpose of this is to try and block one more lines of communication between people that want harm on us.
Yeah, I'm for less government control. But it is the governments role to protect its people, why wouldn't we give them every advantage?
It isn't laws like this that take away our freedom. It is the people that seek to corrupt the laws that take away our freedom. It is at that time that we as a democratic country decide when people need to be removed of power and when laws have been twisted to other uses then what was meant. At that time we then remove the person in power and change the law. We have that power.
I do understand what your getting at Gruber. This is just a first in a line of little things that could just keep chipping away and building up until we the people no longer have any control. That is a scary thought and is the last thing i would ever want. But I believe in the sincerity behind a law like this (maybe because I am just a sucker to see the good in people, and if I am a sucker... diregard this whole post).
It is now our job as the American public to seek to make sure this law is used with integrity; as soon as it isn't or leads to criminal acts, it needs to be altered.
Good topic Gruber, it could branch out to some interesting conversation if continued.
I think I agree with Pat...I am not quite sure yet, but he brings a good point...The difference between Washington and the dictators of the world are that I really do trust that this is to protect us rather than Washington's own political interests. It's a case that is not all that partisan or political even at that. It is strictly for our own safety! I am somewhat up in the air on this, but these are my first thoughts...
frotm p corcs"My quick thoughts are this. First, who really cares if some 50 year old white man in a suit in Washington is listening to any of our conversations. I have nothing to hide... Do you?"
one comment what is the reason for spying before suspicion has been submitted to the court?
a warrant requirement is a CONSTUTIONAL RIGHT".
no excuses are presented for exceptions when it comes to a citizens rights.
br3n
Post a Comment